This first section of Wanderlust isn't bad: the script by director David Wain and Marino--longtime writing partners with pictures like Wet Hot American Summer and Role Models to their credit--has some satiric bite (Linda's epically terrible HBO pitch is particularly funny), and there are plenty of laughs as George and Linda seem to be on their own road to hell. Once the story arrives (and stays) at Elysium, though, it all gets very tired. Free love! Naked penises! Hallucinogenics! Natural food! Back in the 1960s, there was a spate of terrible comedies about how silly hippies were, movies like Skidoo and The Happening, and while Wanderlust is far superior to those bombs, it's not in a very different genre. George and Linda will be shocked and charmed by the quaint spirits who surround them (the group includes Alan Alda, Kathryn Hahn, Joe Lo Truglio and Lauren Ambrose). Then they'll be tempted by the possibility of opening their marriage (the main threats to fidelity are supplied by Malin Akerman and Justin Theroux). They'll both go a little overboard (originally, in the version of the film shown to early audiences, Linda's devotion to Elysium's environmental cause included a protest that featured Aniston's first on-screen nude scene in all its mammary glory, but that's been digitally covered up and and editorially removed, reportedly because of Aniston's concerns about real-life boyfriend Theroux's feelings.) Eventually, though, the couple realizes that this life just isn't for them, and they'll have to find a saner alternative.THE SHOWBUZZDAILY REVIEW: "Wanderlust"
This first section of Wanderlust isn't bad: the script by director David Wain and Marino--longtime writing partners with pictures like Wet Hot American Summer and Role Models to their credit--has some satiric bite (Linda's epically terrible HBO pitch is particularly funny), and there are plenty of laughs as George and Linda seem to be on their own road to hell. Once the story arrives (and stays) at Elysium, though, it all gets very tired. Free love! Naked penises! Hallucinogenics! Natural food! Back in the 1960s, there was a spate of terrible comedies about how silly hippies were, movies like Skidoo and The Happening, and while Wanderlust is far superior to those bombs, it's not in a very different genre. George and Linda will be shocked and charmed by the quaint spirits who surround them (the group includes Alan Alda, Kathryn Hahn, Joe Lo Truglio and Lauren Ambrose). Then they'll be tempted by the possibility of opening their marriage (the main threats to fidelity are supplied by Malin Akerman and Justin Theroux). They'll both go a little overboard (originally, in the version of the film shown to early audiences, Linda's devotion to Elysium's environmental cause included a protest that featured Aniston's first on-screen nude scene in all its mammary glory, but that's been digitally covered up and and editorially removed, reportedly because of Aniston's concerns about real-life boyfriend Theroux's feelings.) Eventually, though, the couple realizes that this life just isn't for them, and they'll have to find a saner alternative.THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Our Idiot Brother"
There's never much doubt where Our Idiot Brother is going, but getting there is a loose, enjoyable ride. (In Sundance, the movie had an oddly curt last minute that didn't quite send people out with the smiles they were led to expect, and Harvey Weinstein has remedied that.) The movie has a genuinely sweet sensibility (the film itself is a family affair, directed by Jesse Peretz and well-written by his own sister Evgenia Peretz and her husband David Schisgall), and even the most obnoxious character--that would probably be Coogan's--is allowed to score some laughs. Everyone in the cast is great company; no one particularly stretches or showcases new skills, but they interact with assurance and what seems to be great affection for one another. As director, Peretz makes a solid recovery from The Ex, which could never reconcile its sitcom tone with a plot that needed to be darker. Here Peretz commits completely to positivity, and the result is buoyant.ARCHIVE REVIEW; "How Do You Know"
On Homevideo and VOD: Still Not Worth Seeing.
James L Brooks is legendarily responsible for some of the great comedies and comedy-dramas of his generation, with a record that stretches from "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" to "The Simpsons" on TV, and Terms of Endearment to Broadcast News in film. Recently, though, he's stumbled as a movie writer-director, and last year he followed the problematic Spanglish with the woeful HOW DO YOU KNOW. Brooks just never seemed to get his bearings on a story that was more of a conventional romantic comedy than his usual work. Reese Witherspoon's professional softball player starts as a reasonably strong character, but as she dithers between Paul Rudd (a mousy executive in danger of going to jail for a scandal he didn't cause) and Owen Wilson (a big-league ballplayer who's a Casanova), one loses interest in all of them. Even Jack Nicholson as Rudd's father, usually a good-luck charm for Brooks, seems to be doing a nightclub impressionist's version of "Jack Nicholson." The film cost $100M to make because of the huge star salaries (and Brooks' typically extended production schedule)--and that's without marketing costs--and made only $48M worldwide, causing a fountain of red ink. Just sad for all concerned, not least the fans.







