RSS
Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts

The Sked: WEDNESDAY RATINGS October 19

The fast nationals for Wednesday give Game 1 of the World Series a 3.9 Adult 18-49 rating (yet to be time zone adjusted).  Last night we predicted a 3.8 in the fast nationals and a 4.1 in the official nationals.  This number keeps it from being the worst Game 1 rating in history...just the second worst. 

The second lowest-rated Game 1 in MLB history will be enough to give FOX a win on the night, and the performance is on par with an X Factor original episode.  At least, FOX isn't forced into the unenviable position of replacing a higher-rated show for the Fall Classic.

ABC's Modern Family takes the crown as the highest rated show of the night (a 5.6 in the fast nationals and probably a 5.7 in the official ratings later today).  The other comedies were near their recent levels (The Middle 2.9, Suburgatory 3.1, Happy Endings 3.0), while Revenge dropped back down to a 2.5 (from a 2.7 last week).  Given the heavy promotional support Revenge continues to receive, this is probably a bitter pill for ABC to swallow.  For the night, ABC averaged a 3.3 rating.

CBS also averaged a 3.3 Wednesday, up one tenth from last week.  Survivor (3.3) and Criminal Minds (3.9) were each up one tenth, while CSI (2.6) was flat.

NBC averaged a 1.7 for the night, the same rating the network has turned in for three weeks.  Up All Night's birth episode did not pop a number (2.1), and the Whitney repeat (1.2) drifted down two tenths to Harry's Law reliable rating (Jason Alexander guest starring couldn't push Harry's above that 1.2 rating).  Another promo note, the spot at the end of Up All Night announcing that Whitney was coming up said "Whitney airs after The Office -- next on NBC".  Clearly a recycled spot, the voiceover wasn't changed for Wednesday night.  The error certainly didn't cause viewers to flee at 8:30, but it is one of those details that should be done correctly on network television. 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The Sked: The Sad Downward Slide of World Series Ratings

Pity the poor Former National Pastime.  In the quarter century that Nielsen has used the PeopleMeter to measure demographic ratings, viewership of the World Series has dropped by more than half in the key advertising sales demographic.  From 1987 (the first year demographic ratings came from electronic meters and remote controls rather than a paper diary) through 1993 (the last baseball season before the disastrous strike), Game 1 of the World Series averaged a 10.1 Adult 18-49 rating.  In the ten years after the strike (1995-2004), Game 1 averaged a still respectable 7.0 rating.  But since 2005 (as players scored fewer runs and hit far fewer home runs without the benefits of steroids), the average Game 1 has turned in a 5.0 rating (far below what a regular season NFL game generates).


Before the Strike that killed the 1994 postseason, it looked like the World Series was relatively bullet-proof.  No match-up from 1987-1993 features the New York Yankees or Boston Red Sox (remember how lean those years were for those franchises?).  The period was riddled with regional pairings (Minnesota-St Louis, LA-Oakland, even two teams from the same market, San Francisco-Oakland).  Two of the Series even featured a Canadian team.  Even worse, CBS broadcast four Series (1990-1993) with coverage as lame as their Olympic efforts.  And yet the lowest Game 1 in this period was an 8.5 rating. 

From 1995-2004, the sport embarked on a long downward slide.   Game 1 ratings in that decade ranged from a high of 9.3 in 1996 (NY Yankees-Atlanta) to a low of 5.0 in 2002 (Anaheim-San Francisco).  It might be tempting to assume that 2002 was ignored because it was too regional, too California and lacking a marquee Northeast team.  But note that 2001 (Yankees-Arizona) was not much better: a 5.3 rating.  If we look at Game 1 ratings in this period featuring the Yankees or the Red Sox versus Game 1 ratings for Series without these iconic teams, there is only a slight advantage to having New York or Boston involved: a 7.2 average rating with New York or Boston and a 6.8 rating without.

However, in recent years the presence of Boston or New York has saved the sport from utter shame.  Since 2005, Game 1 of a Yankees or Red Sox Series has averaged a 6.1 rating (not bad in the DVR era), while Game 1 match-ups without either team have averaged all the way down to a 4.4 rating.   

The nadir for Game 1 came in 2006 when the St Louis Cardinals opened against the Detroit Tigers and only mustered a 3.6 rating.  This was also the last time Game 1 aired on a Saturday night, the least viewed of the week.  Since 2007, the new format places Game 1 on Wednesday (weather permitting, of course).  Until the fast nationals Thursday morning give us our first indication of how this year's Game 1 rated (featuring the Texas Rangers at the St Louis Cardinals), take a look at the table below for a complete historical view.  I am guessing this year's Game 1 will rate about a 4.1 in the official nationals and around a 3.8 in the fast nationals, just avoiding the "worst ever" title.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE SKED: Wednesday Ratings - Network Scorecard


A smiley face for one network and a frowny one for another, on the third night this week disrupted by postseason baseball.

ABC:  Everything came up fairly rosy last night at the Alphabet.  SUBURGATORY should be inches away from a full season pick-up after its third consecutive strong outing, and even better, REVENGE went in the opposite direction from Pan Am, and had a nice bump from last week.  That might be partly due to CSI being hurt by the unexpected baseball game at 10PM, but ABC will take it.  Combine all that with the stellar MODERN FAMILY number and an impressive increase for HAPPY ENDINGS (which also might be partly attributable to the absence of X Factor on FOX), and it was a pleasant evening at ABC.


NBC:  Here's where NBC is these days:  their good news last night was that the repeat of WHITNEY with its 1.3 decisively outrated the new episodes of Free Agents that it replaced.  (Incidentally, BBCAmerica has started airing the original British Free Agents--albeit in heavily edited form--and it's a tutorial in how a network can duplicate a show's premise, basic characters and even storylines and turn it into something completely different and far worse.)  UP ALL NIGHT, with its full season order, declined to a lousy 2.0, while the best that can be said for HARRY'S LAW and SVU is that they were consistent.

CBS:  SURVIVOR  and CRIMINAL MINDS barely moved from last week.  The CSI decline was a little steeper, but as noted, that show faced unusual competition in its timeslot.

FOX:  Even though a network benefits financially from a long playoff series, at this point FOX is probably hoping Texas can just win its next game today/tonight/whenever it stops raining and put the network out of its misery.  Last night's unexpected primetime game was down at least 20% from X Factor, and that will probably get worse when final numbers are released later today.

CW:  Repeats of RINGER (back ordered yesterday) barely kept the lights on with a 0.4, which was even with last week's H8R and didn't affect AMERICA'S NEXT TOP MODEL.  

Tonight NBC will find out if the extra reruns this week have helped Whitney and Prime Suspect at all, and CBS will hope for an uptick from Person Of Interest.  

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE SKED: Tuesday Ratings - Network Scorecard


It's taken this long for full ratings to be released from yesterday, mostly because of FOX's baseball coverage.  And as Mitch Metcalf just reported, tonight is going to be a disaster for FOX as well, with a rain delay in what was supposed to be an afternoon game likely meaning the evening's scheduled X FACTOR won't air.  Before yesterday fades into memory, here's how the networks fared.


ABC:  The network launched Tim Allen's LAST MAN STANDING, and the results were... OK.  A 3.6 is certainly nothing to complain about, and if the show stays at that level, ABC will be very happy.  But this series has been a marketing priority for the network since the Upfronts back in May, and its premiere had the most carefully chosen date of any fall launch, designed to avoid competition from Glee for as long as possible.  After all that, the show managed a number only 0.3 higher than the premiere of the far less heavily promoted Suburgatory, and nowhere near the averages of New Girl or 2 Broke Girls so far this season, let alone their premieres.  The fact is that we won't know where Last Man stands until November, when FOX's regular schedule returns.  DANCING WITH THE STARS was up a bit, but we can't know if that's because of Last Man or the sharply reduced competition on FOX; BODY OF PROOF was down from last week.

NBC:  I believe (someone will tell me if I'm wrong) that last night's PARENTHOOD was the first to ever build from its BIGGEST LOSER lead-in.  Part of that is because Loser continues to sink, of course, but it's also true that Parenthood (which aired another superb episode last night--special kudos to cast members Peter Krause, Monica Potter, Dax Shepard, Mae Whitman and Max Burkholder) has been rock-solid in the ever-shrinking universe of NBC ratings, and is now one of their most reliable 1-hour shows.  

CBS:  Even with baseball as competition (which should theoretically affect CBS most due to its older audience), there was barely any movement in their numbers.  The question that the network will have to decide is whether they're content with losing one-third of the NCIS LA audience at 10PM when millions decide not to watch UNFORGETTABLE, or if they think they can do better in that slot.

FOX  As Mitch Metcalf noted in his baseball piece, at some point FOX has to wonder why it's still in the postseason baseball business.  Last night's' game with its 2.4 rating was 30% below the prior week's episode of Glee, and almost 45% lower than New Girl, and that's without even counting the mess that rain delays and extra innings have made of the network's Sunday, Monday and now Wednesday schedules.  And the worst news for FOX is that with the teams left in this year's postseason, there's more than a small chance that this will be the lowest-rated World Series ever.

CW:  As noted elsewhere, CW seized the uptick in RINGER's rating to give it a full-season order, then gave them to HART OF DIXIE and THE SECRET CIRCLE as well.  None of which changes the fact that the network did an 0.7 last night with 90210 and 0.8 with RINGER, but it seems as though, for now at least, that's good enough for this network.

Tonight's numbers will be askew due to the last minute change in FOX's schedule, but ratings to keep an eye on will include NBC's UP ALL NIGHT (for the first time followed by a repeat of WHITNEY), the results of SUBURGATORY's Week 3, and the post-premiere number for FX's AMERICAN HORROR STORY.  (We'll have a Pilot + 1 review of the latter here later tonight.)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Moneyball"





Michael Lewis' book Moneyball was a marvelous read, but seemed like dim source material for a movie. Credit, then, is due to the creators of the film version--the various producers, screenwriters Steven Zailian and Aaron Sorkin, and director Bennett Miller--for finding a compelling narrative spine in a true-life story about the change in an industry's way of thinking.

Billy Beane (played by Brad Pitt on screen), General Manager of the Oakland A's, had a seemingly insuperable problem: how to operate a baseball team that could compete with the Yankees of this world on roughly a quarter of their budget for team salaries? In solving that dilemma, he and the young economist he discovered (Jonah Hill, playing a character called Peter Brand but actually a fictionalized version of Paul Podesta), changed the way baseball teams are put together. 

Beane and Podesta/Brand pioneered a statistics-laden method for measuring player worth that ignored time-honored criteria like body type in favor of the ability to get on base. (These theories had started before Beane, with statisticians like Bill James, but had never been put into practice.) To the disdain and disbelief of his scouts and coach, Beane built an "island of misfit toys" of a team, and the movie is the story of the first season they played. 

The triumph of statistics in sports is an unlikely subject for an underdog story (the film is almost entirely about the front office--we just get glimpses of the players through the movie), but it works. Largely this is due to Pitt and Hill, who make a dynamite team. Pitt is both dogged and funny, and Hill underplays as he never has before, to excellent effect. (The two share a sequence together gaming the season's trade deadline--straight from Lewis' book--that's thrillingly smart and hilarious.) The rest of the cast fades in comparison, although Philip Seymour Hoffman is of course tasty in a briefer role as doubting coach Art Howe.

With its wordy exposition and near-abstract disputes (not to mention Sorkin as screenwriter), the obvious point of comparison for Moneyball is last year's The Social Network. Moneyball doesn't quite measure up--Beane isn't as fascinating a character as Network's Mark Zuckerberg, and Miller, although grand with actors, doesn't have the visual or pacing skill of David Fincher. Like the Oakland team it describes, Moneyball's triumph is managing to get to the playoffs at all, whether or not it wins the title.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS