RSS
Showing posts with label hamm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hamm. Show all posts

THE SHOWBUZZDAILY REVIEW: "Friends With Kids"





FRIENDS WITH KIDS:  Worth A Ticket - Sitcom, In A Good Way

We live in a pop culture where the recent Emmy Award nominees are so clearly superior to the films up for this past year's Oscar that it's not even worth arguing about. (Mad Men vs The Artist?  Game of Thrones vs The Help?  Modern Family vs War Horse?  Seriously?)  So the days when one could look down at a movie comedy by calling it "sitcom" are pretty much done--comparing a movie to Parks & Recreation, Louie or New Girl is, if anything, high praise.



Calling Jennifer Westfeldt's FRIENDS WITH KIDS akin to a sitcom, then, is more descriptive than critical.  The romantic-comedy-drama involves the inter-group relationships of 6 old friends who live in and around a major city (New York in this case), much as Happy Endings and How I Met Your Mother do.  The group includes 2 married couples:  Leslie and Alex (Maya Rudolph and Chris O'Dowd), and Ben and Missy (Jon Hamm and Kristen Wiig).  The story centers, though, on the 2 who are single:  best buddies Julie (Westfeldt) and Jason (Adam Scott), who have been inseparable since college, but never romantically involved.  (They love each other unreservedly, but aren't physically attracted.) 

The movie's title has double meanings, and the first is that as the story begins, Julie and Jason are feeling like the odd friends out, since both married couples are raising babies and/or toddlers, changing the dynamics of their marriages and the group in general.  Both Julie and Jason want children, but as they watch what parenthood is doing to their friends, and with each of them so far unable to find "the one" with whom they want to have it all, they eventually come to the title's second meaning:  they decide to have a baby together, just as friends (outside dating encouraged), with responsibility and custody split down the middle and no change, they vow, in their own relationship.

You don't need to have watched Ross and Rachel for all the years of Friends to figure out very quickly where all this is going to end up.  Nature may abhor a vacuum, but that's nothing compared to the way romantic-comedy feels about 2 good-looking unattached pals who've considered romances with everyone on earth except each other.  The issue with a movie like Friends With Kids is just how enjoyable and insightful the journey to that destination is.

This is where Westfeldt, making her directing debut (she previously wrote Kissing Jessica Stein and Ira & Abby) acquits herself well.  Her script may be glib and, in the end, predictable, but it's also marked by some sharp, bawdy humor, and later in the proceedings by more than a little surprisingly searing drama.  (A New Year's Eve gathering for the group prompts a particularly scorching monologue from Hamm, who in his day job is not unacquainted with characters who bare dark undersides.)

It's tempting but misleading to label Friends With Kids as trendily influenced by Bridesmaids, featuring as it does the same kind of 4-letter humor--much of it from the women characters--and half the same cast, but as it happens, Friends debuted at Toronto last fall, shortly after Bridesmaids hit theatres.  The similarities are superficial anyway, since Friends mostly eschews wacky slapstick for more of a concentration on relationships.  But the overlap in casts is all to the good, because these actors continue to be great together.  As for the newcomers:  Scott, who has been very dark indeed in indie movies like The Vicious Kind, brings a little of that edge to a less idealized romantic role than the one he plays in his own day job on Parks & Recreation.  Westfeldt makes a marvelous, funny pair with him, although one wishes that as a writer she'd resisted the cliche of having Julie be the sensitive one who's the first to become overwhelmed with true emotion.  In the smaller roles of Julie and Jason's significant romantic interests (think of them as the guest stars brought in for sweeps), Edward Burns effectively turns on the charm, and the much-maligned Megan Fox deserves some credit for completely holding her own with this high-powered ensemble.  

Friends With Kids isn't any kind of cinematic event--in terms of sheer quality, it's not better than 2 hours of TV's best comedies--but it provides the kind of self-contained 2-hour satisfaction that isn't TV's stock in trade (along with the kind of sex jokes confined to HBO and Showtime).  If you've been sitting on your couch long enough and want a smart, sophisticated and sometimes moving comedy on a bigger screen, this is the right movie to see.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE SKED: Emmy Odds - Theirs and Ours: Drama

With the help of some online bookmaking sites, we have the latest "official" odds for tonight's Emmy Awards.  Let's take a look about what they say about the conventional wisdom, and make some adjustments where they don't make sense.



BEST DRAMA

Bookie Odds:

Mad Men - 1:2
Boardwalk Empire - 11:4
The Good Wife - 5:1
Game of Thrones - 14:1
Friday Night Lights - 16:1
Dexter - 33:1

ShowbuzzDaily Odds:

Mad Men - 1:1
Boardwalk Empire - 7:5
Game of Thrones - 5:1
The Good Wife - 8:1
Friday Night Lights - 11:1
Dexter - 20:1

Mad Men has won 3 years in a row:  can it match The West Wing and Hill Street Blues with 4?  Maybe so, but it's going to be an awfully close race against HBO's Boardwalk Empire  Mad Men's not-so-secret weapon may be its episode The Suitcase, the 2-hander for Jon Hamm and Elisabeth Moss that was one of the best hours the show has ever aired; but this being an industry award, it could be hurt by the extended and very public AMC/Matthew Weiner travails that didn't leave a good taste in anyone's mouth.  Boardwalk could also be hurt by the support for HBO's other nominee Game of Thrones (although that's probably too much of a genre show to win outright).  The Good Wife, a marvelous show in its own right and the only pure network nominee (Friday Night Lights being an NBC/DirecTV share), is a possible dark horse here.  Friday Night, which richly deserves a statuette, is probably getting an "attaboy" pat on the back on its way out the door.  Dexter's season was markedly inferior to its previous one with John Lithgow as the monstrous Big Bad, and is probably out of the running.



BEST DRAMA ACTOR

Bookie Odds:

Jon Hamm, Mad Men - 4:11
Steve Buscemi, Boardwalk Empire - 23:10
Kyle Chandler, Friday Night Lights - 14:1
Michael C. Hall, Dexter - 14:1
Timothy Olyphant, Justified - 16:1
Hugh Laurie, House - 20:1

ShowbuzzDaily Odds:

Jon Hamm, Mad Men - 8:5
Steve Buscemi, Boardwalk Empire - 3:1
Kyle Chandler, Friday Night Lights - 6:1
Timothy Olyphant, Justified - 12:1
Hugh Laurie, House - 14:1
Michael C. Hall, Dexter - 20:1

The most important name here is the one that's absent: because of AMC's scheduling, Bryan Cranston wasn't eligible for Breaking Bad after 3 wins in a row, opening the way for what will probably be a tight race between Hamm (who's never won) and Buscemi.  The knock against Hamm has been that his Don Draper is too self-contained to appeal to Academy voters, who like their Oscar counterparts prefer their performances big; here again, Mad Man's Suitcase episode may make the difference.  If Friday Night Lights has a chance for any surprise win, it's would be Chandler here.  Olyphant was even better on Justified this season than he was the year before, but it's not an award type role.  Laurie will have a better shot next year if this turns out to be the show's last.  Hall will be hurt by Dexter's sub-par year--and by the fact that he plays, you know, a serial killer. 

BEST DRAMA ACTRESS

Bookie Odds:

Julianna Margulies, The Good Wife - 15:20
Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men - 3:2
Kathy Bates, Harry's Law - 6:1
Mireille Enos, The Killing - 12:1
Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights - 16:1
Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order:  Special Victims Unit - 25:1

ShowbuzzDaily Odds:

Julianna Margulies, The Good Wife -1:1
Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men -2:1
Kathy Bates, Harry's Law - 8:1 
Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights - 12:1
Mireille Enos, The Killing - 25:1
Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order:  Special Victims Unit - 40:1

The biggest shock of last year's Emmys was Kyra Sedgwick's win over Julianna Margulies; The Good Wife continues to be a superb show, Margulies is a well-respected former winner, and it's likely the Academy will make amends for its oversight.  Moss has the best chance of unseating her, once again because she's got that episode of Mad Men that could almost have been designed as an Emmy showcase.  One can never underestimate the Academy's attraction to performers of a certain age, which puts Bates in the running as a dark horse.  Britton has deserved this award every year Friday Night Lights was on the air, but no one ever said awards were fair.  Enos has little chance of winning for a show whose finale left many viewers angrier than they'd been since the end of Lost, and Hargitay has won already, with no one seeming to think she needs another.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

BRIDESMAIDS: Bachelorette Party



Watch It At Home: As Long and Uneven As a Real-Life Wedding.

Few recent movies have arrived bearing such a bouquet of goodwill as the new comedy BRIDESMAIDS.  It marks the movie starring and screenwriting (with Annie Mumolo) debut of Kristen Wiig, generally considered one of the shining lights of this generation's "Saturday Night Live;" it's produced by Judd Apatow, whose best movies have combined big laughs with quirky humanity; it's directed by Paul Feig, creator of the beloved TV series "Freaks and Geeks;" and it's the exceedingly rare mainstream Hollywood movie to feature a cast of women without relying on the usual Hudson/Heigl/Roberts/Bullock kind of romantic lead. It's been greeted with remarkable critical support (90% on Rotten Tomatoes).  It is, indeed, admirable... I just wish it were a little better.



So what happened?  It feels as though the movie is being praised for what it intermittently manages to be, rather than what it often is, which is a frustratingly uneven, terribly overlong (125 minutes, more running time than The King's Speech needed) picture that both discards and grabs for dear life onto the cliches of "women's movies."  The story is a simple framework:  Wiig plays Annie, who's been down on her luck professionally since her bakery went under, and whose romantic life is pretty much limited to mutual exploitation with Ted (Jon Hamm, very funny)--her lifeline is her longtime friendship with Lillian (Maya Rudolph).  The news that Lillian is engaged makes Annie happy but also feeling adrift, and the fact that she's maid of honor forces her to interact with other eccentric bridesmaids (Melissa McCarthy, Ellie Kemper, Wendi McLendon-Covey), and to compete with the rich, grasping Helen (Rose Byrne) for control of the wedding plans.   

There are, admittedly, some scenes between the women, especially towards the end, that have a level of emotional complexity we don't see in typical rom-coms.  But along the way, many of those scenes are as broad and obvious as anything in Sex and the City.  And the Apatow touch is felt with a heavy hand in sequences that force-feed the movie crude physical humor, like a food poisoning that leads to much vomiting and diarrhea, and a scene where the bridesmaids are on a plane to Vegas and Wiig gets accidentally drugged, and it all goes on so long (it's like one of Wiig's SNL sketches from hell) that it felt like the whole theatre should have arrived at the Vegas airport by the time the scene was over.  It's also somewhat puzzling to see the film acclaimed for not forcing romance on its single protagonist when there's a prominent, and obvious, romantic comedy storyline that features a charming Irish traffic cop (Chris O'Dowd) who's got "love interest" written all over him from the moment he appears.  There's been great effort to distinguish Bridesmaid's tone from that of The Hangover, but I'm not sure how the characters in that picture were any sketchier than the women here.

As a piece of filmmaking, Bridesmaids isn't exactly a prime example of craft (which isn't unusual for an Apatow production).  Neither Feig nor cinematographer Robert Yeoman are able to make the movie look better than we'd expect from a well-budgeted single-camera network show, and editors William Kerr and Mike Sale must have been paid extra under the table to let scenes meander on. 

None of this is to say that Bridesmaids is a waste of time:  Wiig is a genuinely unconventional presence at the center of a Hollywood film, and several of the supporting actors, most notably McCarthy, successfully go for broke with their roles.  There are laughs here, and moments of honesty.  It's easy to root for Bridesmaids (and apparently many people are); but like many a wedding guest who's indulged a little too much at the open bar, it's not quite as fascinating as it thinks it is.

(BRIDESMAIDS - Universal - 125 minutes - R - Director:  Paul Feig - Script:  Kristen Wiig, Annie Mumolo - Cast:  Wiig, Maya Rudolph, Melissa McCarthy, Rose Byrne, Wendi McLendon-Covey, Ellie Kemper, Chris O'Dowd, Jon Hamm - Wide Release)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS