When all the Sked PLAYERS gather in New York, the pilots have been screened for the network's own executives, but the only "real people" who've seen them are those participating in Research testing. The results of those tests become the only "objective" data regarding the appeal of a given show, so they're a critical part of the process.

Test results are broken down by any number of demographic markers (gender, age, income, and viewing behavior, among others), and in reviewing the results, the networks concentrate on their target demos, both for their network in general and their vision of the specific show.
Once the test results are in, they're subject to all manner of debate. Did a show test well because its format was comfortably familiar (or badly, because it was something new and different)? Did the star test well because he or she is a brand name? Is it the kind of show that needs to be pre-sold via promos so that viewers will know what they're going to be seeing? How does the audience fit with the other shows set for that given night? Seinfeld is famously a giant hit show that tested horribly--which leads to every producer of a show that tests horribly claiming their show is the next Seinfeld.
Do pilot test results accurately predict success on the air? The results are mixed. Each network applies a different set of algorithms to the Research results in order to estimate on-air performance, and each has a variable track record. The bottom line is that Research provides insight into the audience. In the end, research is just one piece of a complicated puzzle--but because it provides actual numbers and statistics, an important one.
And when all this work is done, what happens at the Upfront presentations themselves? Keep reading.
Stay with SHOWBUZZDAILY all next week, as we give you the smartest and most informed analysis of the network schedules as they're announced.
0 comments:
Post a Comment