SOURCE CODE is this weekend's major live-action opening, so here's a look at some recent work by its star Jake Gyllenhaal and its director Duncan Jones.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b921/5b9212937f04a87b83f855e0131372d29e5278eb" alt=""
Unfortunately, Prince of Persia wasn't it. Based on a video game and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, the film offered plenty of CG creatures, time travel, and PG-13 violence. But the picture, directed by the usually
very fine Mike Newell (whose credits include the much better fantasy adventure Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire), was burdened by a lousy script (credited to Boaz Yakin, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard, although as with most Bruckheimer epic one assumes there were other contributors). And Gyllenhaal, although he had buffed himself up to play a shirtless hero, was about as convincing a Persian prince as--well, as Seth Rogen would be as the Green Hornet (if you could imagine such a thing). The picture was made with everything except imagination, emotional commitment or a spirit of fun, and on a rumored $200M budget (meaning closer to $350M when global marketing costs are included), it made $335M. (It also did over 70% of its business overseas, a phenomenon discussed in Mitch Metcalf's column today.) Not the way to start a franchise, or a mainstream Hollywood action career. On Starz networks and homevideo: Still Not Worth Seeing.
very fine Mike Newell (whose credits include the much better fantasy adventure Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire), was burdened by a lousy script (credited to Boaz Yakin, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard, although as with most Bruckheimer epic one assumes there were other contributors). And Gyllenhaal, although he had buffed himself up to play a shirtless hero, was about as convincing a Persian prince as--well, as Seth Rogen would be as the Green Hornet (if you could imagine such a thing). The picture was made with everything except imagination, emotional commitment or a spirit of fun, and on a rumored $200M budget (meaning closer to $350M when global marketing costs are included), it made $335M. (It also did over 70% of its business overseas, a phenomenon discussed in Mitch Metcalf's column today.) Not the way to start a franchise, or a mainstream Hollywood action career. On Starz networks and homevideo: Still Not Worth Seeing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4d1a/b4d1a1a78e4e45b4b0d4cdc964c095344ab8a0c4" alt=""
--Mitch Salem
0 comments:
Post a Comment