RSS
Showing posts with label downey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label downey. Show all posts

SHOWBUZZDAILY OSCAR WATCH: THE TELECAST




Until its final 45 minutes, the one thing that could be said about this year's Oscar telecast was that it was at least brisk.  Merely 2 hours and 15 minutes into the show, there were amazingly only 3 awards and the In Memorium segment still to go.  But for ABC, running under the appointed time would be at least as bad as running over--those commercials all had to get on the air--so at that point the brakes went on, and like the last 2 minutes of a close basketball game, when endless fouls and time-outs stretch the very nature of time, the remainder of the show moved in extreme slow-motion.  Most egregiously tedious:  the fatuous nominee-by-nominee description of each Best Actor and Actress performance that Natalie Portman and Colin Firth were forced to deliver.


The fact that from the network's point of view, the biggest problem with this year's show was that it ran too efficiently tells you all you need to know.  Billy Crystal, given the mantle of Host like a retired general brought back to action after some dreadful military defeat (in this case two of them:  last year's James Franco/Anne Hathaway debacle and the Brett Ratner/Eddie Murphy embarrassment), did what he does.  There was the polished opening bit with Billy inserted among the film clips and movie stars, the "Wonderful Night For Oscar" musical number (not particularly audible, although it was unclear whether that was Crystal's fault or ABC's sub-par microphones, a problem all night), the light digs at celebrities that were better timed than they were funny, the now-ancient "What They're Really Thinking" sketch, which ran horribly flat (Brad Pitt is thinking about parent-teacher conferences!  That's because he and Angelina have so many kids!  LOL!).  There wasn't a genuinely imaginative or inspired moment in Crystal's whole evening, but damn it, the show ran on time. 

The whole tone of the night seemed something like an Old People's Revenge, as though the Academy, after both its efforts at getting "hip" had ended in disaster, had thrown up its hands and embraced its creakiness.  (It was like the Academy had turned into the aged derelicts getting their revenge on Malcolm McDowell in the second half of A Clockwork Orange.)  Instead, they ridiculed--repeatedly--the whole idea of pandering to youth.  Take that, you young demo you--get off our lawn!

So the entertainment centerpiece of the night was Cirque du Soleil, the members of the troupe throwing each other around like cast members in Broadway's Spider-Man and resembling the Vegas floorshow they are.  A seemingly endless series of montages featured movie stars photographed like the Witnesses in Warren Beatty's Reds (including, briefly, Beatty himself), opining very seriously about What The Movies Mean To Us, and sidestepping the fact that few of them have probably paid for a ticket in a real movie theater for the past decade or more.  Christopher Guest's rep group turned up in a parody of screening focus groups that was so inside baseball, you'd have had to be a marketing executive to find it funny. 

Among the presenters, few of the pre-planned schticks paid off:  Will Ferrell and Zach Galifianakis with cymbals and Robert Downey Jr's unbearable Best Doc/reality-show bit (watching it, you felt sorry for Gwyneth Paltrow, a seeming impossibility) both fell flat.  Emma Stone managed to survive her gimmick, partly because it was fun to watch Ben Stiller play straight man, and partly because Emma Stone seems able to survive anything.  Chris Rock had some funny moments.  And Angelina Jolie stuck her leg out.

It came as a surprise to exactly no one this past week when the LA Times reported breathlessly that an analysis of the Academy membership revealed it to be predominantly elderly white guys.  And this show was for them, from the winners (Christopher Plummer, Meryl Streep, Woody Allen, 10 of the awards split between 2 loving tributes to the world of classic cinema) to the telecast itself.  The night felt as though the Academy was desperately hoping that if everyone pretended the world wasn't changing... maybe it wouldn't.

Good luck with that.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows"



SHERLOCK HOLMES:  GAME OF SHADOWS:  Watch It At Home - Far Too Elementary

We have to come to terms with the fact that an entire generation may recognize the name Sherlock Holmes not as the template for brilliant amateur crime-solving, but as a moderately intelligent action-comedy hero who dresses up in funny clothes.  This effect on the populace is what a $524M worldwide gross buys you, and with the sequel SHERLOCK HOLMES:  GAME OF SHADOWS, director Guy Ritchie, producer Joel Silver, and new screenwriters Michele and Kieran Mulroney, provide more of the same.  

Game of Shadows is in one way superior to 2009's Sherlock Holmes:  it does away with the supernatural mumbo-jumbo and takes place in some version of the real world.  There's no great mystery about who the villain is, since this time Moriarity (Jared Harris) himself is on the scene.  The convoluted and more-than-slightly ridiculous mystery Holmes has to solve is just what the evil one is plotting, which turns out to be not dissimilar from what master criminals have been plotting in big-scale action movies for decades. It all leads to a showdown between Holmes and Moriarity at a location that does come from Conan Doyle (and in being so used, reveals the ending). 


Watching Game of Shadows, one is struck more than anything else by the waste.  It's not just Robert Downey, Jr, Jude Law and Harris--the very fine cast includes Rachel McAdams, briefly reprising her role from the first movie, Noomi Rapace (Lisbeth Salander in the Swedish Dragon Tattoo series) as a Gypsy fortune-teller, Stephen Fry, having a fine old time as Holmes's brother Mycroft, and Eddie Marsan as Inspector Lestrade.  Philippe Rousselot again provides gorgeous, atmospheric photography, and Sarah Greenwood's turn-of-the-century production design is sumptuous.  No one can question Ritchie's ability to create sharp action sequences.

But to what end?  Even leaving aside the distortion of Holmes as a character, Game of Shadows is an action franchise that's already tired.  We get more signature sequences of Holmes anticipating every blow of a fight in slow-motion before the first punch is thrown or shot is fired, then enacting it all as planned; more giggly no-it's-not-really-homoerotic scenes of Holmes standing in the way of Watson's marriage to the understanding Mary (Kelly Reilly), more silly and unconvincing costumes (look, he's in drag!) for Downey to wear in disguise.  There isn't a scene that can't be overly worked for a gag; without spoiling the ending, it provides a microcosm of the movie by starting out as fairly clever and then continuing to push until it succeds in becoming farcial and dumb for the sake of a cheap laugh.  Downey seems to be leaking his ADD-plus-ego Tony Stark/Iron Man persona onto Holmes, and while the rapport between him and Law is still the center of the movie's appeal, it feels more studied and forced this time around. 

The Sherlock Holmes franchise clearly works for a wide audience, and Game of Shadows will inevitably make a great deal of money too.  Plenty of things blow up, and Downey and Law remain fairly good company.  Overall, though, the movie is 129 laborious minutes of paycheck-grabbing by a group of very talented people who don't particularly care if their secret motive is uncovered.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS