RSS
Showing posts with label jolie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jolie. Show all posts

SHOWBUZZDAILY OSCAR WATCH: THE TELECAST




Until its final 45 minutes, the one thing that could be said about this year's Oscar telecast was that it was at least brisk.  Merely 2 hours and 15 minutes into the show, there were amazingly only 3 awards and the In Memorium segment still to go.  But for ABC, running under the appointed time would be at least as bad as running over--those commercials all had to get on the air--so at that point the brakes went on, and like the last 2 minutes of a close basketball game, when endless fouls and time-outs stretch the very nature of time, the remainder of the show moved in extreme slow-motion.  Most egregiously tedious:  the fatuous nominee-by-nominee description of each Best Actor and Actress performance that Natalie Portman and Colin Firth were forced to deliver.


The fact that from the network's point of view, the biggest problem with this year's show was that it ran too efficiently tells you all you need to know.  Billy Crystal, given the mantle of Host like a retired general brought back to action after some dreadful military defeat (in this case two of them:  last year's James Franco/Anne Hathaway debacle and the Brett Ratner/Eddie Murphy embarrassment), did what he does.  There was the polished opening bit with Billy inserted among the film clips and movie stars, the "Wonderful Night For Oscar" musical number (not particularly audible, although it was unclear whether that was Crystal's fault or ABC's sub-par microphones, a problem all night), the light digs at celebrities that were better timed than they were funny, the now-ancient "What They're Really Thinking" sketch, which ran horribly flat (Brad Pitt is thinking about parent-teacher conferences!  That's because he and Angelina have so many kids!  LOL!).  There wasn't a genuinely imaginative or inspired moment in Crystal's whole evening, but damn it, the show ran on time. 

The whole tone of the night seemed something like an Old People's Revenge, as though the Academy, after both its efforts at getting "hip" had ended in disaster, had thrown up its hands and embraced its creakiness.  (It was like the Academy had turned into the aged derelicts getting their revenge on Malcolm McDowell in the second half of A Clockwork Orange.)  Instead, they ridiculed--repeatedly--the whole idea of pandering to youth.  Take that, you young demo you--get off our lawn!

So the entertainment centerpiece of the night was Cirque du Soleil, the members of the troupe throwing each other around like cast members in Broadway's Spider-Man and resembling the Vegas floorshow they are.  A seemingly endless series of montages featured movie stars photographed like the Witnesses in Warren Beatty's Reds (including, briefly, Beatty himself), opining very seriously about What The Movies Mean To Us, and sidestepping the fact that few of them have probably paid for a ticket in a real movie theater for the past decade or more.  Christopher Guest's rep group turned up in a parody of screening focus groups that was so inside baseball, you'd have had to be a marketing executive to find it funny. 

Among the presenters, few of the pre-planned schticks paid off:  Will Ferrell and Zach Galifianakis with cymbals and Robert Downey Jr's unbearable Best Doc/reality-show bit (watching it, you felt sorry for Gwyneth Paltrow, a seeming impossibility) both fell flat.  Emma Stone managed to survive her gimmick, partly because it was fun to watch Ben Stiller play straight man, and partly because Emma Stone seems able to survive anything.  Chris Rock had some funny moments.  And Angelina Jolie stuck her leg out.

It came as a surprise to exactly no one this past week when the LA Times reported breathlessly that an analysis of the Academy membership revealed it to be predominantly elderly white guys.  And this show was for them, from the winners (Christopher Plummer, Meryl Streep, Woody Allen, 10 of the awards split between 2 loving tributes to the world of classic cinema) to the telecast itself.  The night felt as though the Academy was desperately hoping that if everyone pretended the world wasn't changing... maybe it wouldn't.

Good luck with that.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

"KUNG FU PANDA 2" - Black Belt

Worth A Ticket; This franchise has been working out.

Over the past few years, DreamWorks Animation has been emerging a bit from its place as the jokey, insubstantial sidekick to Pixar's superhero studio.  How To Train Your Dragon was a thoroughly enjoyable surprise, and even though Megamind had its share of pop culture parody, it also managed a real story and heart.  The first Kung Fu Panda was less impressive, built on lovely visuals but mostly serving as a vehicle for Jack Black's pudgy cartoon charm, but the new KUNG FU PANDA 2 aims higher and succeeds, a relatively serious adventure movie with more pressing emotional stakes and some impressive action chops. 

The villain this time is a sinister peacock, and let's face it, despite his more sympathetic recent roles in the Harry Potter and Dark Knight series, nobody does sinister villains like Gary Oldman.  His Lord Shen has figured out how to turn fireworks into explosives, and has invented the first cannons, which he's now planning to use to take over all of medieval China.  More evil still, he's been told by a soothsayer (voiced by Michelle Yeoh) that he'll one day be defeated by a panda, so he's disposed of all the pandas in China--with one conspicuous exception, of course.   Naturally Po (Black) and his fellow warriors (various animals with the voices of Angelina Jolie, Seth Rogan, Jackie Chan, David Cross, and Lucy Liu), not to mention Po's master Shifu (Dustin Hoffman) are dispatched to save the day.  Lord Shen's secret weapon, though, is that he also holds the key of what happened to Po's panda parents, and how he ended up raised by a goose (James Hong), so Po will have to prove he can absorb this knowledge and still be a hero.  (A final scene setting up the next sequel lets us know there are more revelations to come.)

The script by Jonathan Aibel and Glenn Berger, who also wrote the first film, this time doesn't linger on Po's cuteness, instead giving the character some melancholy and (metaphorical) weight.  Jennifer Yuh Nelson's direction has scale and she keeps the story pushing forward at a steady pace; there are live-action directors this season who could benefit from a look at her comprehensible, fast-moving combat sequences. Even the 3D is top drawer, although inevitably you have to give up some image brightness in exchange; there are lots of swooping falls and flights, and plenty of objects reaching into the foreground of the image.  One particularly nice visual touch is that when Po has fragmentary flashbacks of his past, those sequences are rendered as hand-drawn animation, rather than computer-generated.  The vocal cast also does a fine job:  in addition to Oldman's reliable villainy, Black manages not to push too hard, as does Hoffman, and Jolie gets the most to do among the supporting cast.  
Kung Fu Panda 2 certainly isn't in a league with the truly superb animated films we've been privileged to see over the past decade like Up and Ratatouille and the Toy Story series; Pixar, at its best, makes giant hits that are also works of art.  But Panda 2 is a solid piece of entertainment that doesn't pander (sorry) to its young audience or cause pain to adults, and as the trailers for upcoming family movies make clear (The Smurfs?  Really?), that's no small accomplishment.

(KUNG FU PANDA 2 - DreamWorks Animation/Paramount - PG - 92 minutes - Director:  Jennifer Yuh Nelson - Script:  Jonathan Aibel, Glenn Berger - Cast:  Jack Black, Gary Oldman, Angelina Jolie, Dustin Hoffman, Seth Rogen, Lucy Liu, David Cross, Jackie Chan, James Hong - Wide Release)

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS