RSS
Showing posts with label adventure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adventure. Show all posts

THE SHOWBUZZDAILY REVIEW: "John Carter"




JOHN CARTER:  Watch It At Home - Never Goes Into Orbit

All signs suggest that JOHN CARTER will be a financial failure of historic proportions, mostly because of its colossal cost (Disney admits to $250M, which almost certainly means close to $300M when reshoots and last-minute CG are included--and that doesn't count the $100-150M of a big-time global marketing campaign).  It would be fun to pile on and lambaste the movie as an embarrassing fiasco, or alternatively to be contrarian and point to it as an overlooked, underrated pop masterpiece, but the truth is much more tedious:  it's just a mediocre time-waster that happened to cost a ton of money.


John Carter may run short in some areas, but no one can accuse it of lacking plot.  The script by director Andrew Stanton, Mark Andrews and (separately) novelist Michael Chabon is based on the novel "Princess of Mars" by Edgar Rice Burroughs, and it incorporates Burroughs himself (Daryl Sabara) into an elaborate framing device, in which he's a young relative of Carter's (Taylor Kitsch), summoned home after Carter's sudden death in 1881.  The story is instantly fishy--Carter's body is in a tomb that's been specially rigged to open only from the inside--although we have to wait for the end of the movie for it to pay off.    

Meanwhile, Burroughs reads the journal Carter left for him (cue the voice-over narration), and the main body of the story begins.  Carter, a former Confederate soldier, was prospecting for gold--and had actually found a lot of it--in 1868 when he was dragooned by an evil Army officer (Bryan Cranston) into fighting Native Americans.  He goes exploring in a cave where he happens to touch a magic crystal just as the mysterious, dying other inhabitant of the cave finishes saying some magic words, and instantly finds himself--

On Mars, of course,  Or Barsoom, which he discovers is the natives' name for the planet.  (Earth is Jarsoom, in case you were wondering.)  Where Carter, thanks to lower gravity and different bone density, can leap whole buildings in a single bound (or two at most).  He finds himself embroiled in a war between 3 factions of the natives:  the green 4-armed warrior Tharks (CG creations with the voices of Willem Dafoe as their leader and Samantha Morton as his daughter); the humanoid Heliums, led by King Tardos Mos (Ciaran Hinds) and his daughter, Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins), who's a scientist the way Denise Richards was a nuclear expert in The World Is Not Enough; and the bad-guy Zodangas, whose leader Sab Than (Dominic West) wants to destroy the Tharks and Heliums or marry Dejah, whichever comes first.  Actually, the real villains are the non-Martian (I think) Therns, who are led by Matai Shang (Mark Strong), and who are meaner versions of the Watchers from Fringe who can change identity at will and feed off warfare and planetary destruction (don't ask).  Oh, and there's a friendly giant hippopotamus/dog creature who seems to have wandered in from one of Stanton's Pixar movies and likes to lick Carter's face and rescue him.

You can appreciate the ambitions of Stanton and his team--they were honestly trying to tell an epic story much classier than, say, Prince of Egypt--but the narrative is overlong, tiresome and uninvolving.  The script is loaded with one howler line of dialogue after another (even after Carter has sipped a magic potion that enables him to understand and speak Martian, all the characters sound like they're being translated from the Tharkan).  Stanton doesn't seem to want to acknowledge how silly all this is, and playing it straight just makes the movie even campier than it had to be.

There are fine actors in the cast, but Stanton, whose first live-action movie this is, handles them badly--the Burroughs books were an acknowledged influence on the Star Wars movies, and Stanton seems have absorbed that in the worst possible way, drawing clunky, flat line-readings from almost all his performers.  (That's not what you're supposed to steal from George Lucas, man!)  Kitsch can act, we know that from Friday Night Lights, but his low-key, naturalistic strengths don't lend themselves at all to big-scale action-movie performing, and he and Collins couldn't have less chemistry (Kitsch only seems comfortable acting with the 4-armed green Tharks).  As the villains, Strong and West both look like they're mentally on their respective bank websites, paying some bills.

Stanton has achieved some CG feats:  the Tharks are wonderfully done, and there are Martian landscapes with genuine grandeur (of course, these are the parts of the movie most akin to the animation world from which Stanton comes).  The action sequences, though, are a mess, confusingly edited and mistaking rushing for rousing.  

John Carter isn't a shameful failure; it's just a failure.  It's Disney and not the filmmakers that has to take the blame for the size of the hole the movie going to make in the studio's earnings.


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Dino Thunder, Vol. 3: White Thunder (DVD)

Power Rangers Dino Thunder, Vol. 3: White Thunder
Power Rangers Dino Thunder, Vol. 3: White Thunder (DVD)
By James Napier

20 used and new from $13.50
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: movie about power rangers(3), power rangers(3), tv series(2), dvd(2), ninja storm vol 2, jungle fury, adventure, paul schrier, kids, power, science fiction, operation overdrive

Review & Description

Studio: Buena Vista Home Video Release Date: 01/09/2007 Run time: 110 minutes

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #34365 in DVD
  • Brand: Buena Vista Home Video
  • Released on: 2004-09-07
  • Rating: NR (Not Rated)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Animated, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, NTSC
  • Original language: English
  • Running time: 110 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Dino Thunder (Video Game)

Power Rangers Dino Thunder
Power Rangers Dino Thunder (Video Game)
By THQ

Buy new: $13.99
53 used and new from $1.88
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: video games(21), playstation 2(4), adventure(3), power rangers(3), games(2), kids(2), action(2), dino thunder, carson, zords, family, cash-in

Review & Description

A brilliant mad scientist named Mesogog plans to send the world back into the age of dinosaurs, and only three students powered by the Dino Gems can stop him. Transformed into the Dino Thunder Power Rangers, they must stop Mesogog and his army by utilizing the mighty DinoZords in the first Power Rangers title made available for the PlayStation 2, Power Rangers: Dino Thunder. A robotic action game based on the television show of the same name, Dino Thunder allows players to jump into more than 50 different missions and mini-games in nine wide open, free-roaming worlds. Along the way, uses can control up to 18 different Zords including ones from Power Rangers: Ninja Storm and Power Rangers: Wild Force.

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #2739 in Video Games
  • Brand: THQ
  • Model: 752919460566
  • Released on: 2005-08-25
  • ESRB Rating: Everyone
  • Platform: PlayStation2
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: .60" h x 5.30" w x 7.50" l, .5 pounds

Features

  • Over 50 different missions
  • Control 18 different Zords
  • Ability to switch between Zords in mid-mission
  • Megazord battles with special attack power-ups as in the show.

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Treasury Storybook (Hardcover)

Power Rangers Treasury Storybook
Power Rangers Treasury Storybook (Hardcover)
By Kathryn Knight

17 used and new from $7.74
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: power rangers(3), kids(2), childrens books(2), dk publishing, adventure, fun, easy reader, 2000s

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #462367 in Books
  • Published on: 2006-11
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 1.38 pounds
  • Binding: Hardcover
  • 158 pages

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie (DVD)

Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie
Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie (DVD)
By Jason David Frank

Buy new: $5.99
52 used and new from $2.00
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: power rangers(5), tv series(2), dvd, adventure, power ran, martial arts, fantasy

Review & Description

The evil space alien Divatox plans to unleash the dark forces of Maligore, a powerful, fiery creature imprisoned inside a volcano on the magical island of Nuiranthias. She can reach the island only by traveling through the dangerous Nemesis Triangle, and for that she needs the special powers of the magician Lerigot. But Lerigot flees to earth, seeking the only people who can stand against Divatox and her plan the Power Rangers. Along with the new Blue Ranger, their turbo powered Zords, and the unexpected help of the original Power Rangers set out on their most thrilling and dangerous adventure yet!

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #2456 in DVD
  • Brand: Fox Home Entertainment
  • Released on: 2003-09-02
  • Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.85:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, NTSC
  • Original language: English
  • Dimensions: .25 pounds
  • Running time: 99 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Mighty Morphin: White Ranger Kata [VHS] (VHS Tape)

Mighty Morphin: White Ranger Kata [VHS]
Mighty Morphin: White Ranger Kata [VHS] (VHS Tape)
By Paul Schrier

Buy new: $19.36
13 used and new from $2.96

First tagged by CrabbyCats
Customer tags: kata, white power ranger, video, adventure, movie about power rangers, karate, power rangers, mighty morphin power rangers, vhs, action adventure, martial arts, fantasy

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #47497 in VHS
  • Released on: 1996-01-30
  • Rating: NR (Not Rated)
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Closed-captioned, Color, NTSC
  • Original language: English, French
  • Running time: 50 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie (DVD)

Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie
Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie (DVD)
By Karan Ashley

Buy new: $5.49
74 used and new from $3.17
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: power rangers(13), fantasy(9), movie about power rangers(6), mighty morphin power rangers(6), martial arts(6), dvd(4), adventure(3), heroic missions(2), dvds i own, gfgrgffdfdf, campy kids show, action adventure

Review & Description

Power up with six incredible teens who out-maneuver and defeat evil everywhere as the Mighty Morphin Power Ranger, But this time the Power Rangers may have met their match, when they face off with the most sinister monster the galaxy has ever seen.

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #1288 in DVD
  • Brand: Fox Home Entertainment
  • Released on: 2003-09-02
  • Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.85:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, NTSC
  • Original language: English, French
  • Subtitled in: English
  • Dimensions: .25 pounds
  • Running time: 95 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The Best of the Power Rangers - The Ultimate Rangers (DVD)

The Best of the Power Rangers - The Ultimate Rangers
The Best of the Power Rangers - The Ultimate Rangers (DVD)
By Paul Schrier

19 used and new from $9.20
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: power rangers(6), tv series(4), adventure(2), tv serie, power rangers-dvd, science fiction, paul schrier, action comedy

Review & Description

These are the earth-shattering episodes that "Power Rangers" fans voted #1. The episodes that explode with action and turbo-powered adventure as the Power Rangers face off against the most diabolical forces of evil and destruction on this world and beyond. Contains five episodes, one from each series digitally remastered:
Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers "White Light" Parts 1 and 2
Power Rangers in Space "Countdown to Destruction" Parts 1 and 2
Power Rangers Lost Galaxy "To The Tenth Power"
Power Rangers Lightspeed Rescue "Trakeena's Revenge" Parts 1 and 2
Power Rangers Wild Force "Forever Red"

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #18962 in DVD
  • Brand: Ultimate
  • Released on: 2003-04-01
  • Rating: NR (Not Rated)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, Live, NTSC
  • Original language: English
  • Running time: 168 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Ninja Storm - Looming Thunder (DVD)

Power Rangers Ninja Storm - Looming Thunder
Power Rangers Ninja Storm - Looming Thunder (DVD)
By Pua Magasiva

18 used and new from $8.82
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: power rangers(3), tv series(2), dvd(2), adventure(2), science fiction(2), ninja storm vol 2, carson

Review & Description

Studio: Buena Vista Home Video Release Date: 01/09/2007 Run time: 79 minutes

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #122405 in DVD
  • Brand: BUENA VISTA HOME VIDEO
  • Released on: 2003-09-02
  • Rating: NR (Not Rated)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Closed-captioned, Color, DVD, NTSC
  • Original language: English
  • Running time: 80 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Mystic Force - Dark Wish - The Blockbuster (DVD)

Power Rangers Mystic Force - Dark Wish - The Blockbuster
Power Rangers Mystic Force - Dark Wish - The Blockbuster (DVD)
By Firass Dirani

16 used and new from $6.30
Customer Rating: 2.4

Customer tags: power rangers(6), adventure(2), movie about power rangers(2), action adventure, power rangers mystic force, horror thriller

Review & Description

Hang on tight for legendary entertainment as the complete Dark Wish saga unfolds in this spectacular, full-length blockbuster DVD. The Power Ranger's heroic crusade for good vs. evil is put to the ultimate challenge when a wicked mystic army drains all color and hope from Earth. Now the five teens chosen to fulfill their destiny and become powerful, protective warriors have lost their power and must fight to restore it. Join the next generation of Power Rangers as their most thrilling, action-packed adventure is captured on screen with awesome special effects and extraordinary space creatures -- both good and bad!

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #47662 in DVD
  • Brand: BUENA VISTA HOME VIDEO
  • Released on: 2006-09-26
  • Rating: Unrated
  • Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Formats: Animated, Color, DVD, NTSC
  • Original language: English
  • Dimensions: .20 pounds
  • Running time: 63 minutes

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Power Rangers Dino Thunder (Video Game)

Power Rangers Dino Thunder
Power Rangers Dino Thunder (Video Game)
By THQ

Buy new: $15.42
45 used and new from $4.48
Customer Rating: 4.3

Customer tags: video games(21), playstation 2(4), adventure(3), power rangers(3), games(2), kids(2), action(2), dino thunder, carson, zords, family, cash-in

Review & Description

A brilliant mad scientist named Mesogog plans to send the world back into the age of dinosaurs, and only three students powered by the Dino Gems can stop him. Transformed into the Dino Thunder Power Rangers, they must stop Mesogog and his army by utilizing the mighty DinoZords in the first Power Rangers title made available for the PlayStation 2, Power Rangers: Dino Thunder. A robotic action game based on the television show of the same name, Dino Thunder allows players to jump into more than 50 different missions and mini-games in nine wide open, free-roaming worlds. Along the way, uses can control up to 18 different Zords including ones from Power Rangers: Ninja Storm and Power Rangers: Wild Force.

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #13642 in Video Games
  • Brand: THQ
  • Model: 752919460566
  • Released on: 2005-08-25
  • ESRB Rating: Everyone
  • Platform: PlayStation2
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: .60" h x 5.30" w x 7.50" l, .5 pounds

Features

  • Over 50 different missions
  • Control 18 different Zords
  • Ability to switch between Zords in mid-mission
  • Megazord battles with special attack power-ups as in the show.

Click Check Price & More Reviews

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Rise of the Planet of the Apes"



RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES - Worth A Ticket:  Simian Power

Although it's positioned as the last big adventure epic of the summer, for most of its length Rupert Wyatt's RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES isn't really an action movie.  Somewhat surprisingly, while it establishes an alternative mythology to explain (spoiler alert?) apes taking over the world, the script by Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver honors the ethos of the original 1968-73 film series and concentrates on (simian) character and story.  Despite some flaws that ultimately catch up with it, the result is one of the more satisfying pictures of the season.


In the new timeline of Rise, it isn't the aftermath of nuclear war that causes the mutation leading to intelligent apes and the downfall of humanity.  Rather, the culprit is that ever-popular bugaboo, genetic tinkering.  Will Rodman (James Franco) works at the multinational pharmaceutical company Gen-Sys, where like many a movie scientist who shouldn't have tampered with nature, he only wants to do good.  Specifically, he's trying to find a cure for Alzheimer's, a malady that hits close to home because it afflicts his music teacher dad (John Lithgow).  Will has come up with a drug that builds healthy cells in the brain, counteracting the effects of the disease, and he's ready to start testing it on chimps (the name of the first test subject is the first of several nods to the original Apes).  Disaster ensues, and the tests are abandoned, but not before Will manages to rescue a chimp baby from the lab and bring it home with him.  That baby, ominously for those who remember Roddy McDowell's second incarnation in the Apes series, is named Caesar, and he's been exposed to the miracle drug.

Since Caesar's brain cells were healthy to begin with, the drug creates even more brain power for the chimp, giving him super-intelligence.  In sequences that won't be the last to echo the recent documentary Project Nim, we follow Caesar over a period of years with Will and his father, living somewhere between a pet and a younger brother.  (Along the way, Will acquires a vet girlfriend, played by Frieda Pinto.)  But of course, Caesar is still an ape, and when Will's father is attacked, and Caesar tries to rescue him, he does so in a way more fit for the jungle than the suburbs.

This leads to the most interesting section of the movie, which is essentially a jailbreak caper:  Caesar is imprisoned in a "shelter" where owner Brian Cox (who starred in Wyatt's indie The Escapist, another prison break picture) and his reliably evil son Tom Felton mistreat the captives, and where Caesar plots his escape.   Caesar, for the first time in his life, is among other apes, and there's very little dialogue; the almost purely visual sequences of Caesar figuring out how to form alliances and strategize the simian power structure are beautifully done.

Here's the place to note that, thanks to the new wonders of CG and performance-capture technology, "Caesar" isn't a guy in an ape suit, as in the original Apes films (and in Tim Burton's misbegotten 2001 remake), but a wholly computer-generated creature who interacts with complete believability alongside the human actors.  His performance is created by Andy Serkis, who's previously done this with Gollum in the Lord of the Rings pictures and as Peter Jackson's King Kong.  As in Avatar, the line between "special effect" and "acting" are all but erased here; the eyes and expressions of Caesar look utterly real.

The special effects are a little less effective in the last section of the movie, where crowds of apes are required, and where the conventions of big-budget Hollywood action lead to the apes performing super-simian stunts that look as fake as when CG'd humans perform them in other movies.  This is also where Wyatt's inexperience with big action sequences shows, and where the script starts to falter by becoming more generic popcorn entertainment.  (It doesn't help that there are suddenly advances in Caesar's abilities that seem too abrupt, or that this section is kicked off by one too many salutes to the original Apes, a blunt gag that comes at what should be a critically important point in the story.)

The bigger underlying problem with Apes is that the humans are never remotely as interesting as the simians.  While Caesar is a fully-fledged, complex character, and even the supporting apes have their moments of characterization, Will is completely bland, and Franco does nothing to make him more engaging (I'm not sure Franco is ever going to be a movie star, if that's even what he wants to be); Pinto, Cox, Lithgow, Felton and David Oyelowo as Will's boss have even less to do.  People were never at the center of the Apes series (Charlton Heston aside), but this story is set in the contemporary human world, so it's a more serious shortcoming here.

Glitches aside, Rise is mostly a smart and even soulful entertainment that retains the spirit of its 1960s-70s roots.  It's the rare tentpole movie that makes the idea of sequels seem like a prospect, rather than a chore.  (Thinking of which, don't jump from your seat as soon as the end credits start.)  Franchise of the Planet of the Apes, anyone?

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU: Captain America: The First Boxoffice

The Hollywood Reporter has some rough early numbers for Friday's boxoffice, and the news looks good for CAPTAIN AMERICA:  THE FIRST AVENGER.  Including Thursday midnight grosses of $4M, it seems to be around $25M for the day.  This would be right in the neighborhood of its Marvel-mate Thor, which had a $25.5M opening day and a $65.8M weekend, and ahead of X Men:  First Class and Green Lantern, which both opened with $21.4M.  

Second place belongs to HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS (PART 2), headed for around $16M on Friday.  This would be well below the $20.8M of Deathly Hallows (Part 1)'s second Friday, and further demonstrates how frontloaded Hallows 2 is:  despite an insane 80% or more drop from its record-breaking opening day, it would nevertheless be $50M higher in total than Hallows 1 at this point in its run.  Hallows 2 should still easily be the highest grossing Harry Potter domestically, but a $400M total is starting to look like a stretch. 

FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS is in third place with around $7M on opening day.  This would put it almost even with January's No Strings Attached and its $7.3M Friday (and $19,7M weekend), and below Bridesmaids ($7.8M/26.2M), Bad Teacher ($12.2M/31.6M) and Horrible Bosses ($9.9M/28.3M).  Friends also has instant competition coming with next weekend's Crazy Stupid Love.  

Read Mitch Metcalf's weekend predictions here, and watch for his detailed analysis of Friday's full numbers and the weekend grosses later this morning.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Captain America: The First Avenger" - Red, White & Retro

 

CAPTAIN AMERICA:  THE FIRST AVENGER - Worth A Ticket:  Marvel Goes Back To the Future


There's a certain irony in the fact that, in this summer of Super 8 and its Spielberg rapture, the most successfully Spielbergian movie of the season is Marvel's CAPTAIN AMERICA:  THE FIRST AVENGER.  Its connection to Steven Spielberg is faint but important:  director Joe Johnston served as Art Director on both Raiders of the Lost Ark and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and later directed an episode of TV's Young Indiana Jones; not concidentally, this is something like the Indiana Jones 4 that Kingdom of the Crystal Skull never was, and although it has its limitations, Captain America is a surprisingly entertaining old-fashioned adventure.


One of the most engaging things about Captain America as a movie is that it's as unpretentious as a $150M+ giant superhero extravaganza can be.  The first section of the movie tells the story of Steve Rogers (Chris Evans, CG'd in the way of Brad Pitt in Benjamin Button) a 90-pound weakling but endlessly stout of heart, who longs to join the Army in World War II and fight against Nazis, but is rejected because of his physical frailty.  Steve finally runs into Dr. Erskine (Stanley Tucci, putting on a great show), a German refugee scientist who has a magic serum--not to mention his gorgeous aide Peggy Carter (Hayley Atwell).  Johnston and screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeeley take their time with this part of the story, and it pays off; although we know that Steve will turn into, well, Captain America, we get to know him first as a plucky underdog.  Even after the transformation, there's a witty sequence where the new Steve is turned into a pitchman for War Bonds (it's like the comedy version of Clint Eastwood's Flags of Our Fathers), complete with a musical production number by Alan Menken--by the time Steve gets to Europe, we're as longing for him to see battle as he is.

The huge action sequences, when they finally arrive, deliver in size and design, but they're kept for the most part on a human scale--like the Indiana Jones movies, they stay just this side of what an actual human being might be able to do.  Evans is less interesting as the full-fledged Captain than he was as the puny version, but he has a few moments where he gets to reveal the scrawny kid within, and the rest of the time he hits the stalwart buttons effectively.  And there are welcome supporting actors to perk things up between battles:  Tommy Lee Jones does his Tommy Lee Jones thing--it's like he invented macho snark--and Toby Jones is a junior evil Nazi.  Atwell, who's been doing very good work under the radar in projects like Woody Allen's little-seen Cassandra's Dream and the TV miniseries Pillars Of the Earth, has a snappy way with dialogue to go with her looks, and the gadget man on Captain America's team is Howard Stark, who would one day father Iron Man (ah, Marvel); he's played by Dominic Cooper, who'll soon be seen to much splashier advantage in The Devil's Double.   

The very clever production design by Rick Heinrichs creates a larger-than-life version of 1940s archetypes without calling too much attention to itself (as opposed, say, to Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow's attempt to do the same thing):  tanks, motorcycles and planes that make sense in the World War II context but are convincingly a bit beyond reality.  The photography by Shelly Johnson, unfortunately, is obscured by a terrible 3D conversion that has little effect beyond badly smudging the original image--this is definitely a picture where audiences should try to save the money and find a 2D auditorium.

Where Captain America really falters is in its villain.  Hugo Weaver, who may be out of fantasy role inspiration now that he's done The Matrix, Lord of the Rings, Transformers and The Wolfman, seemingly does a deliberate Christoph Waltz imitation as Red Skull; he's your basic raving super-Nazi (he even listens to Wagner), with a little of Belloq in Raiders of the Lost Ark and Voldemort's noselessness.  Red Skull never says or does anything interesting in the picture, and that lowers the stakes of the drama quite a bit; at this point in movie history, if you're going to scare us with a Nazi villain, it takes more than a red digital make-up job to do it.

Despite that central flaw, Captain America is a fun ride.  It's actually disappointing that in their zeal to get the character into next year's all-important Avengers conglomerate (consumer note:  sit through all 10 minutes of credits and you'll be rewarded with the teaser for next year's everyone-but-the-kitchen-sink epic), Marvel was in such a hurry to pull him out of the 1940s.  This retro fantasy could have made a nice variation from their usual formula, but it's seemingly a one-time effort; although we must all believe in the powers of Joss Whedon, he'll have his hands full juggling half a dozen heroes in Avengers, and the Captain's charm may not age well.  That, however, is next year's movie problem.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU REVIEW: "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 2)"



HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS (PART 2) - Worth A Ticket - The Event of the Summer

The boxoffice totals for tonight's midnight screenings of HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 2 aren't available quite yet, but it was a remarkable experience to go to a shopping center multiplex and find its 6-story garage filled up to the roof even though every store and restaurant in the place was long closed.  (And then, leaving after 2AM, to walk through the throngs just arriving for 3AM overflow shows.)  J.K. Rowling's 7 novels, and the 8 films based on them, are arguably the most powerful narrative engines of their generation, a combination of plotting, character and a completely imagined, inhabited magical world that's left its contemporaries in the dust. 


If Deathly Hallows Part 1 was the healthy meal audiences needed to consume in order to gather their energy and maintain good health for the struggles ahead, Part 2 is practically all dessert. Where the earlier Potter movies were set over the course of an entire school year, the bulk of Deathly Hallows Part 2 takes place within a single 24-hour period, and it's a collection of mammoth action sequences that keep following one after another.  Unlike, say, some Michael Bay movies one could name, these sequences aren't spectacle simply for the sake of showing off the filmmakers' technical prowess, but carefully crafted steps that proceed toward the confrontation that's been a decade in the making (more than that if you start with the first book's publication):  Harry vs. Voldemort.  

Despite all the budget in the world and a combined 4 1/2 hours of screen time to play with, Deathly Hallows wasn't an easy work for screenwriter Steve Kloves (veteran of all the films except Order of the Phoenix) to adapt.  Rowling's plotting is so dense that thick slices of the novel's pie (Dumbledore's history is mostly gone) still had to be omitted, and short shrift is given to others.  Even the deaths of well-loved characters are sometimes observed only in a couple of shots, and while some iconic characters (Maggie Smith, front and center as Professor McGonagall) are showcased, others (Hagrid) are reduced to a few on-screen moments; when one budding romance is revealed, the characters haven't even shared a scene together in this movie.  

Compared to a typical Hollywood action epic, some of the narrative choices can seem eccentric.  Twice the action is interrupted for long stretches, first (vague Spoiler Alert)  for what is essentially The Severus Snape Story, and then for what readers will recognize as The Dumbledore Railway Scene.  Enormously important twists in the action are determined by obscure rules of wand ownership, which have to be expositioned after the fact.  The latter part of the story becomes somewhat spiritual, in the fairly familiar quasi-religious form that was always latent in a saga that calls its protagonist "The Chosen One," but which the previous stories avoided.  

With all these quirks, the film is a mostly triumphant entertainment.   David Yates, finishing out the series with his fourth consecutive film, moves smoothly from beautifully observed character moments to epic scale, from humorous action sequences that evoke the earliest films in the series (the Gringotts heist) to heartrending revelations about characters we thought we knew.  He's working here with the same technical group as in Deathly Hallows Part 1, including cinematographer Eduardo Serra, editor Mark Day and composer Alexandre Desplat, all of whom do beautiful work; special note should be taken in this installment of Stuart Craig's massive production design (no doubt aided seamlessly by CG) for the war-torn Hogwarts, and the combination of make-up technicians and CG wizards who pulled off the how-are-they-gonna-do-this? epilogue.  (The 3D is a conversion, and while it's not necessary by any means, it's quite good as conversions go.)

The Potter series, though, has most distinguished itself from all other franchises by the phenomenal skill of its cast.  Even the Lord of the Rings series didn't have the depth of characterization and quality of performance that these films have drawn; for this final installment, Ciaran Hinds and Kelly McDonald join the astonishing ensemble.  With all the plotting and action, and the return of many old characters (dead and alive), inevitably while Rupert Grint and Emma Watson are impeccable, they have less to do here than they did in Deathly Hallows Part 1, where they were responsible for carrying whole chunks of the story.  Part 2, though, is very much Daniel Radcliffe's movie, as Harry pieces together the story of his own life, learning truths about himself that Rowling had been nursing through 6 previous books; his stunned disillusion and then his resolute decisions to go on anyway are as inspiring as those of any screen hero one can name.  There's nothing glib about the character or the performance; Harry's ultimate heroism is his insistence on being ordinary.

It's unlikely that we'll see the like of the Potter series again, at least for quite a while, although we'll certainly get  many attempts to duplicate its appeal.  (Coming next year:  The Hunger Games, to name just one.)  Its original author, the filmmakers, cast and crews have done an exemplary job in a genre that's often a cynical display of trailer moments with no particular interest in context.  And credit is due, too, to Warner Bros:  it can't be a coincidence that two of the three best franchises of the past decade, Potter and Christopher Nolan's Batman films, come from the same studio (and the third, Lord of the Rings, was from New Line, a Warners division).  One can't begrudge them any of their billions.

There are people already begging J.K. Rowling to come back to Hogwarts and keep the stories going (and no doubt Warners would be happiest of all if she did).  But think about the last Indiana Jones movie, the last Godfather, Wall Street 2.  Rowling and the thousands responsible for making the films have managed to bring an epic tale to a satisfying conclusion.  Harry Potter deserves to enjoy his life.

HARRY POTTER RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 1)
 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU RETROSPECTIVE: "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 1)"




When the announcement was made that Warner Bros would split HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS into 2 full-length movies, there was a certain amount of cynicism about studio greed--and, indeed, why not pick up an extra billion or so if the opportunity arises?  But really, J.K. Rowling's novels have all been stuffed so full of plot that any of the adaptations could have been 2 movies long--as it is, readers had been complaining all along about the scenes and storylines that had to be cut for time.  (For that matter, this season HBO spent 10 hours on a single volume of Game of Thrones--just nominated for a slew of Emmys--and nobody seemed to have a problem with that.)  


Dividing Deathly Hallows in particular, though, guaranteed that the first film would be what is almost certainly the bleakest, most unsettling movie in the history of giant Hollywood franchises--a picture so awash in futility and death that if it were a standalone project, it probably couldn't get financed, much less muster a deluxe $150M+ budget.  The first half of the Deathly Hallows novel and film presents the Harry Potter saga at low ebb, with its central characters spending much of its length wandering through an unforgiving countryside at a complete loss, falling apart emotionally and failing at all of their goals; they're like Beckett protagonists with wands. 

All of which makes Deathly Hallows (Part 1) perhaps the trickiest production of the whole series, and despite its inherent difficulties, in some ways a special triumph for the filmmakers and stars.  David Yates, directing his third consecutive chapter, has to craft the film out of the bare essentials of the saga; most of the huge supporting cast is reduced to brief appearances, there's no Hogwarts at all, and only a few action sequences.  (Although this film isn't about its guest stars, added to the cast this time--in case the series didn't already have enough great British actors--are Bill Nighy, Rhys Ifans and Peter Mullen.)

Behind the camera this time is Eduardo Serra, the French cinematographer whose works include Girl With a Pearl Earring and many of the later films of Claude Chabrol; once the film has left the city and its black-walled Ministry of Magic, Serra's images becomes warmer than those in Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince, with gorgeous landscapes that emphasize the smallness of these teenagers as they try to defeat a mad and murderous army.  The composer is Alexandre Desplat, whose superb recent scores include The King's Speech and The Tree of Life; his music here is more delicate than any other Potter score (John Williams' original theme is barely to be heard).  Mark Day again serves as Yates' editor, keeping the pace moving forward even as the characters are in stasis.  Stuart Craig is the production designer, as he's been all along; note the subtle way the sequences in the Muggle world, although set in ordinary places like cafes and public restrooms, are slightly off-kilter, odd in a way that suggests a world alien to witches and wizards.  The special effects, often cartoonish and obvious in 2001 (although state-of-the-art at the time), have become so realistic that they seem as real as the sets, and special note should be made of a lovely, distinctive animated sequence that explains the story of the Deathly Hallows themselves.

Ultimately, though, while Deathly Hallows is part of an epic adventure, it's a very intimate story, and the fact that the film is so compelling has to be credited to screenwriter Steve Kloves and the stars Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson.  Those three (and for a chunk of the time, just Radcliffe and Watson)  carry almost an hour of screen time virtually alone, an accomplishment they seem to bring off with ease.  (Kloves, Radcliffe and Watson have justly been praised for adding the brief, exhausted dance between Harry and Hermione that isn't in the book.)  Although there were some complaints about the story's relentlessly grim focus on Harry, Ron and Hermione, it was yet another very smart decision by Rowling and then Yates and Kloves:  staying closer to those three, without the distraction of huge sets and starry supporting characters, and watching them suffer and struggle, only brings the audience more into their story, heightening the emotions for the grand finale.

And so:  the cliff is hanging, the advance ticket sales are record-breaking, the clocks are ticking to 12:01AM.  All that remains is for film projectors around the world to be switched to "On."  

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU RETROSPECTIVE: "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince"



It was all so cute when it started...

David Yates' 2009 HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE is surprisingly funny at times--surprising, because in all other ways the film was, up to that point, by far the grimmest entry in the series.  It's curiously structured:  part romantic comedy, complete with love potions and pining teenagers, and part a baleful story that begins in the immediate aftermath of one tragic death and ends with another, one that will clearly just begin the reign of terror hitting the Potter universe..   


The visual transformation that began with Order of the Phoenix continues in Half-Blood Prince:  the photography, this time by Bruno Delbonnel (his films include Amelie and Across the Universe), is so desaturated that the last reels are almost a greenish-tinged black and white.  Hagrid, the living soul of Hogwarts, is barely present in the film.  The magic portraits and friendly ghosts have vanished from the school, and the hallways themselves seem to have closed in on the students.  Nicholas Hooper's score is a subdued version of his music for Phoenix. The violence, when it comes, is sudden and deadly; no longer do the wizards and witches proudly call out their spells as they wield their wands; much of the time they don't speak at all or mutter the words under their breath.  Yates and his team wring a desolately gripping beauty from this apocalyptic world, with its Death-Eater cloud formations and hungry fires; there's a lovely shot near the end of the students and staff with their wands over their heads, tips glowing, in memorium for their terrible losses. 

The cast, while recognizing the increasingly dark sides of their characters, is able to keep the mood bearable.  The only major addition for Half-Blood Prince is Jim Broadbent, who does a marvelous turn as the vain, secretly shamed Professor Slughorn.   This chapter was Michael Gambon's great showcase, and he leaves (more or less:  like Obi-Wan Kenobi, death doesn't entirely remove him from the saga) a great presence behind.  Daniel Radcliffe is here a legitimate leading man, capturing the heroism, determination and occasional foolhardiness of Harry; he, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are so practiced in their scenes together (which now have a hormonal charge), they can suggest seismic shifts in their relationships with a shifted shoulder or a glance.  Slytherin house points, too, to Tom Felton, who moves past being the school bully to show a boy trying to live up to a level of evil he'd only thought he could imagine.

Steve Kloves, perhaps reenergized by his Order of the Phoenix break, returns to the series with one of his most effective screenplays, expertly traversing the difficult tonal shifts of the material.  As usual, the struggle to keep the film down to 153 minutes requires some characters (Lavender Brown) and details (Harry and Dumbledore's hunt for the horcrux) to get disappointingly short shrift, but the narrative pushes forward commandingly.

Half-Blood Prince was, in a way, the last "Harry Potter movie," and it carries its own nostalgia.  It was the final picture to follow the pattern of the chapters that preceded it:  the half-hour of screen time spent getting to Hogwarts, the next hour or so following our leads in their classes and relations with each other, the build to an epic finale.  All that would be shaken up, as we were pushed steadily ($934M worldwide) to the franchise's grand finale.

HARRY POTTER RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 1)
 



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU RETROSPECTIVE: "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"



Everything is a little smoother in 2002's HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS.  The young actors give more assured performances; Steve Kloves' script, having gotten so much exposition out of its way in Sorcerer's Stone, is faster and more character-based; the camerawork (by Roger Pratt instead of John Seale) is more fluid; the sets by Stuart Craig more believable; the editing (by Peter Honess instead of Richard Francis Bruce) more even.  Chris Columbus' direction is still staid, compared with the films that were to come, but it has an easier, more confident feel.


Chamber of Secrets benefits from a stronger core plot from J.K. Rowling's novel than Sorcerer's Stone had--indeed, it's too bad that in order to keep the film to a manageable 161-minute length (it's still the longest of the series), so much detail about Tom Riddle's vicious diary and its possession of Ginny Weasley had to be sacrificed.  (One wonders if the filmmakers knew at the time how critical a place Ginny would come to play in the overall saga and if that might have changed the balance of the script.)  It introduces such important characters as Moaning Myrtle (wonderfully played by Shirley Henderson), the house-elf Dobby (voiced by Toby Jones) and Lucius Malfoy (Jason Isaacs), as well as Gilderoy Lockhart, who turned out to be relatively incidental to the series but is great fun as played by Kenneth Branagh. The story also starts to introduce the darker emotional notes that would come to dominate later chapters.

One of the side pleasures of watching the Potter movies together is the education it provides in how special effects have improved in the past decade.  Even though Chamber of Secrets came only a year after Sorcerer's Stone, the CG animation of Dobby is far better than the troll had been in the previous film, and the Quidditch match is less cartoony and more exciting.  The actors also do a better a job of integrating their actions with the effects.

Chamber of Secrets, however upgraded, is still superior as a film only to Sorcerer's Stone in the Potter canon.  Columbus, for all his improvement the second time around, continued to be an unexceptional director who couldn't accomplish much more cinematically than a professional job of storytelling.  The actors, too, were still working at inhabiting their characters:  Grint grimaces slack-jawed too much to indicate surprise and fear, and there's not much differentiation between Tom Felton's sneers as Draco Malfoy.  

With Chamber of Secrets, he Harry Potter series was moving in the right direction, trying to improve despite its great success, but not even the most optimistic viewer would have imagined just how much Warners was willing to allow the franchise to be reimagined going forward.  The great leap in the series was still to come.


HARRY POTTER RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix  
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 1) 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU RETROSPECTIVE: "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone"


Whatever one can say about Chris Columbus--and there'll be plenty of less than glowing words about him below--he's the man who cast Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson as the leads in 2001's HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE, and for that Warners should name a building after him.  The three grew over 10 years into plausible physical embodiments of their characters (the studio probably would have liked Radcliffe a little taller, but it hasn't hurt the character; and Watson is really more beautiful than Hermione is meant to be, which in Hollywood is called "casting"), but it was more than that.  In a decade notable for scandals involving one young star after another, they've all remained impossibly professional--when Radcliffe disclosed last week that he'd had a drinking problem during some of the latter years, it seemed to come as much of a surprise to the UK press as to everyone else.  


Oh, and they could act--in fact, they've proven themselves able to evolve and deepen their performances as each successive chapter required more of them. Even more remarkably, it wasn't just the stars who had that capability, but the young supporting actors too--even Bonnie Wright, who as Ginny Weasley has maybe 30 total seconds on screen to start.  In Sorcerer's Stone, the first and weakest of the series, the stars are appealing but show only hints of their potential.  Columbus has them all giving fairly typical child performances for the most part, with too many broad double-takes and expressions of awe mixed with astonishment; occasionally, though, we see the steely resolve and crack comic timing they'd all develop as the films progressed. 

Columbus (along with producer David Heyman and Warners itself, of course) made other good decisions.  No expense was spared on the superb cast of adults:  Maggie Smith, Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, John Cleese, Richard Griffiths, Julie Walters, Fiona Show, and Robbie Coltrane were just some of the great actors who caught the train to Hogwarts.  Steve Kloves, whose previous work, however good, hadn't touched the fantasy genre (Racing With the Moon, The Fabulous Baker Boys) became the workhorse of the series, writing all but one of the scripts that had to pare down J.K. Rowling's enormous, intricate stories to feature length. The production was first-class in every respect, even if the special effects from 2001, particularly the Troll and the somewhat embarrassing Quidditch game, look awfully dated today.  (The baby dragon looks good, though.)

Sorcerer's Stone is quite entertaining, an extraordinary universe capably presented; there's just not anything special about it as a film.  Columbus has cinematographer John Seale shoot Stuart Craig's enormous sets without any personality, using long pans and tracking shots that seem designed only to show off the scale of the production.  Columbus bungles the opening sequences with the Dursleys, playing them for comedy without any of the dark undercurrents Rowling brings to those scenes, and thus flattening some of Harry's emotions that follow.  Because this is the first of the series, there's a huge amount of exposition that has to be explained--Diagon Alley!  Gringott's!  Muggles!  Hogwarts!  Voldemort!  Dumbledore!  Snape!  Quidditch!--and the plot itself, Voldemort trying to use the Stone so he can come back to life, doesn't really kick in until the second half of the movie.  While the picture is never boring, Columbus often coasts from sequence to sequence with indifferent pacing.  Some of the storytelling is surprisingly clumsy, with important plot developments turning on Hagrid blurting things out and then saying "I shouldn't have told you that," Hermione forgetting that she's had the book they've all been searching for all along, and the unlikely "detention" that consists of sending the kids to wander alone through the Dark Forest late at night. 

Sorcerer's Stone provides a decent foundation for the rest of the series, and to the credit of everyone involved, despite its massive success, there was a commitment to improve the franchise going forward.  Watching it now, it's best thought of as the picture you have to get through to get to the good ones.

HARRY POTTER RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE BIJOU BULLETIN: "Spy Kids 4" Stinks (Intentionally)

Get all the stench jokes out of your system:  come August 19, the new SPY KIDS:  ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD won't just be in tired old 3D, but in what they're calling the 4D of Aromascope.  In other words, everyone will be issued scratch 'n sniff cards, and at various times in the movie, we'll all be prompted to take a whiff.  If previous curiosities like Hairspray's Odorama (this was before it was a John Travolta musical) are any sign, expect some innocuous scents and a few that are really foul. The good news:  no extra surcharge for the privilege of sniffing.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS